Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 12:48

Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Microsoft will finally stop bugging Windows users about Edge — but only in Europe - The Verge
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
What’s next?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
New Orleans Saints sign RB Cam Akers to one-year contract - New Orleans Saints
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
A Fifth Force of Nature May Have Been Discovered Inside Atoms - ScienceAlert
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Thank you.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Russia can stop this any time.
Common daily vitamin could slow biological aging, major study suggests - AOL.com
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Cholesterol: Daily cup of beans may lower levels, improve heart health - MedicalNewsToday
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.